I have been feeling a little under the weather lately, and unfortunately I am still not in top condition. Practically speaking, what this means is that I have had little appetite for formulating new universal laws, making keen insights into the nature of our world and drawing supporting charts. In fact, I have been chartless for weeks! Here are some of the things I have been thinking about in the interim:
1. I am reading a
book about another book (this other book being "De Revolutionibus" written by Nicolas Copernicus the 16th century Polish priest and astronomer who advocated a heliocentric model of the solar system). It is written by a professor specializing in the history of science, a subject I have never really appreciated. I mean, what kind of new research does one do on the history of science? Hasn't it already been documented? I got the book because
I knew I would hate it. I like to do that, because often one finds what they initially thought is simply not the case. So I test myself on my preconceptions, and they end up being wrong about half the time (I know, I know....the statistics here are
screaming for a chart!). Of course we like remembering only the times when we are right and therefore we reinforce the idea that are preconceptions are accurate. I like the book.
2. So the whole historical aspect of (1) got me thinking about
my history. I started to investigate my family tree. Despite the rumours, I have found no japanese branches to my family tree and a whole set of family anecdotes are out he window. However, I did find one branch that took me all the way back to 1550 with full names, dates of bith, dates of marriage, etc.! I then backtracked a generation and found another branch that goes back to about the year 800 AD. I am serious! The names and dates become less certain but there is documentation and records to prove that this branch is very probable back to around this date. My final line of inquiry along one branch took me way, way back, but the records become questionable if not non existant. The best I could do at the end of that branch was a first name, some guy named "Adam"...
3. The idea that some things belong in the public trust (like school boards, healthcare and utilities). I have to say, my capitalist tendencies make me skeptical but I watched a program where MIT's
Noam Chomsky made a compelling case. This is just a rehash of (1) where
I knew I would not agree with comrade Chomsky's ideas, but in the end agreed that economists conveniently leave out the role of the public trust in their models. I would like to suggest, however, that the potential benefits to the public will only truly be attained when both the management
and labour components of such institutions are in the public trust. Why should the labour side of an organization in the public trust only be accountable to its own members? Doesn't this just give certain labour organizations a monopoly? We tolerate the monopoly on the management side because at least it is accountable to, well, the public!
Item (3) in particular demonstrates how ill I have been feeling. The fact that I came up with this insight is troubling. This is real party killer material people. Like playing Air Supply's Greatest Hits at your pool party. Life goes on, and the healing takes time. You are in my thoughts and prayers. It is that it is.